Burn Your Koran Before You Burn In Hell For Following The Teachings Of The Koran.

Does Islam Allow Muslims to Rape Female Captives and Slave Girls?

Critics of Islam and Sharia frequently claim that the Qur’anallows Muslim men to rape their female captives and slave girls (i.e. those "whom their right hands possess"). Westernized Muslims, however, are appalled at the thought of their religion allowing rape, so they insist that Islam prohibits this practice. Unfortunately, Islam isn't defined by Westernized Muslims; it's defined by Allah and Muhammadin the Qur'an and the Hadith. So instead of inventing a religion based on the feelings of Westernized Muslims and calling it "Islam," let's turn to the Qur'an and the Hadith to see what Allah and Muhammad have to say about this issue.

As Muhammad's armies raided town after town, they captured many women, who would often be sold or traded. Yet, since the Muslim men were a long way from their wives, they needed wisdom from Allah to guide them in their treatment of their female captives. Allah revealed:

Qur’an 23:1-6—The Believers must (eventually) win through—those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess—for (in their case) they are free from blame. 

Qur’an 70:22-30—Not so those devoted to Prayer—those who remain steadfast to their prayer; and those in whose wealth is a recognized right for the (needy) who asks and him who is prevented (for some reason from asking); and those who hold to the truth of the Day Of Judgement; and those who fear the displeasure of their Lord—for their Lord’s displeasure is the opposite of Peace and Tranquility—and those who guard their chastity, except with their wives and the (captives) whom their right hands possess—for (then) they are not to be blamed.

Notice that Allah commands Muslims to abstain from sex, except with their wives and with "those whom their right hands possess." Allah gave the same sexual rights to Muhammad:

Qur’an 33:50—O Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have given their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses out of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war ...

The Muslim practice of having sex with captured women is reported often in the Hadith, where we learn that Muhammad's only objection to sex with captives was his condemnation of birth control.

Sahih Muslim 3371—We went out with Allah’s Messenger on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing azl (withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger, and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

Sahih al-Bukhari 4138—We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the invasion of Bun Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus [same as "azl" above]. So when we intended to do coitus interruptus, we said: "How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah’s Apostle who is present among us? We asked (him) about it and he said: "It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul till the Day of Resurrection is predestined to exist, it will exist."

Sahih Muslim 3384—Jabir bin Abdullah reported that a person asked Allah’s Apostle saying: I have a slave-girl and I practice azl with her, whereupon Allah’s Messenger said: This cannot prevent that which Allah has decreed. The person then came (after some time) and said: Messenger of Allah, the slave-girl about whom I talked to you has conceived, whereupon Allah’s Messenger said: I am the servant of Allah and His Messenger.

Clearly, Muslims were taking full advantage of Muhammad's teachings about female captives and slave girls. Nevertheless, Muslims eventually captured women along with their husbands, so they wondered if Allah would allow them to have sex with these married captives (since adultery is otherwise forbidden in Islam).

Allah gives his answer in the Qur'an:

Qur’an 4:24—Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess ...

Here's the historical background for this verse:

Sunan Abu Dawud 2150—The Apostle of Allah sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” That is to say, they are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period.

Thus, the Qur’an allows men to have sex with their female captives and slave girls, and the Hadith provides numerous examples of how this was practiced. Yet we must follow this fact through to its logical conclusion. Muslims decided to have sex with their captives, whom they were later going to sell. Some of these captives were women whose husbands and families had been slaughtered by Muslims. Others had husbands who had been captured by Muslims. Would these women gladly consent to sexual intercourse with men who had killed their families or taken their families captive, and who were simply going to sell them into slavery when they arrived at the next town? Certainly not. But since the Qur’an and Muhammad authorized sex with these women (and said nothing about seeking their permission), we can only conclude that Muhammad allowed his followers to rape their captives.

For more on women in Islam, click here.

To see some of the practical consequences of Muhammad's teachings about raping captives, watch this:

resources : http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2014/02/does-islam-allow-muslims-to-rape-female.html





Save the Muslims around the world of Islam.

Trust me.

Burn your koran before you burn in hell for following the teachings of the Koran.

ISIS Rapes Three Year Old Girls In An Open Market, And Forces Women To Divorce Their Husbands So They Can Be Sold Into Sex Slavery

by Ted on September 12, 2014 in Featured, General

By Theodore Shoebat

ISIS is capturing and selling girls as young as three years old to be raped, being in accordance to their false prophet Muhammad who married a six year old girl himself.

They are also forcing women to divorce their husbands so that they can be sold into sex slavery.

The women are sold and then “married” to their buyer in a speedy wedding. As one report says:

As, apparently, are the sex slave markets. A number of people in different cities told me of the systematic rounding up of women and girls; the rapid, enforced divorce of married women from their husbands; the ‘testing’ of single women to assess whether they’re considered to be a virgin; the colour-coding by clothing of married and single women; the selling in an open market with virgins commanding the highest price; and the hasty marriage ceremonies between buyer and the woman they’ve bought in order to justify his raping her.

And these are not just grown women. The youngest girl we heard of being taken for rape was three years old.

The cult mentality of ISIS is shown without the blemish of conniving deception. They are the true representatives of Islam, and the purest image of a heresy and a cult. All cults, be it Mormonism, the Watchtower Movement, the Branch Davidians, the Gothard cult, etc., once allowed to go to their fullest potential, end up in tyranny, totalitarianism, sexual violence, murder and abuse of dissenters or anyone who questions their authority, and many other inhumanities. This is why I expose all cults, and not just Islam, because all spiritual darkness must be exposed.

And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them. (Ephesians 5:11)

resources : http://shoebat.com/2014/09/12/isis-rapes-three-year-old-girls-open-market-forces-women-divorce-husbands-can-sold-sex-slavery/ 

Book : Trinity in the Qur'an.

Book Title         : Trinity in the Qur'an.

Author              : Steiner Budiman.

Publisher          : Angel Publisher.

Pages                :

Price                 : US$ 7.00 ( BUY HERE ).

                           Buy at Google Play and Kobo writing Life with cheaper price is U.S. $ 1.99

BOOK NOW FINISHED YET DONE, FINISHED EXPECTED

Most people including Muslims would never know this. 

There are 3 Trinity in the Qur'an, namely:

1. Trinity as in the Bible. Muslims will always deny this. Once they justify it then Islam will be destroyed because Muslims flock will follow Jesus.

2. Trinity false charges against Christians.The Koran says that the Trinity is God, Mary and Jesus the Son of Mary. This false accusation proves that Muhammad, Jibrail and Allah SWT does not know anything. Ha ... 7x 

3. Trinity of the devil. No one is aware of the Trinity from the devil until the author disassemble it through this book.

This book is based on the verses of the Bible and the Koran. Therefore, accuracy may be accounted for.

Articles that discuss the same topic.

TRITUNGGAL MENURUT BIBLE N ALQURAN.http://antikrismuhammad.blogspot.com/2014/05/tritunggal-menurut-bible-n-alquran.html

SIAPAKAH YANG DIMAKSUD DENGAN KAMI DALAM QURANhttp://antikrismuhammad.blogspot.com/2012/04/siapakah-yang-dimaksud-dengan-kami.html

See our other books in http://angel-publisher.blogspot.com/2013/11/buy-our-ebooks-here-and-get-1-million.html


=====================

Judul Buku        : Tritunggal dalam Alquran.

Author              : Steiner Budiman.

Publisher          : Angel Publisher.

Pages                : 

Price                 : Rp. 21.000,-

SAAT INI BUKU BELUM SELESAI DIBUAT, DIPERKIRAKAN SELESAI

Sebagian besar manusia termasuk umat Islam tidak pernah tahu akan hal ini.

Ada 3 Tritunggal dalam Alquran, yaitu :
1. Tritunggal seperti dalam Alkitab. Umat Islam selalu menyangkal akan hal ini. Sekali mereka membenarkannya maka Islam akan hancur sebab berbondong-bondong umat Islam akan mengikuti Yesus.
2. Tritunggal palsu yang dituduhkan kepada orang kristen. Alquran mengatakan kalau Tritunggal adalah Allah SWT, Maryam dan Isa Putra Maryam. Tuduhan palsu ini justru membuktikan kalau Muhammad, Jibril dan Allah SWT tidak tahu apa-apa. Ha...7x
3. Tritunggal dari setan. Tidak ada seorangpun yang sadar akan Tritunggal dari setan ini sampai penulis membongkarnya lewat buku ini.

Buku ini dibuat berdasarkan ayat-ayat Alkitab dan Alquran. Oleh karena itu keakuratannya bisa dipertanggungjawabkan.

Artikel yang membahas topik yang sama.
TRITUNGGAL MENURUT BIBLE N ALQURAN.http://antikrismuhammad.blogspot.com/2014/05/tritunggal-menurut-bible-n-alquran.html

SIAPAKAH YANG DIMAKSUD DENGAN KAMI DALAM QURANhttp://antikrismuhammad.blogspot.com/2012/04/siapakah-yang-dimaksud-dengan-kami.html

See our other books in http://angel-publisher.blogspot.com/2013/11/buy-our-ebooks-here-and-get-1-million.html

MOHAMMAD AYATOLLAHI TABAAR : Muhammad is the author of the Qur'an.

Who Wrote the Koran?

By MOHAMMAD AYATOLLAHI TABAAR

For more than two decades, Abdulkarim Soroush has been Iran’s leading public intellectual. Deeply versed in Islamic theology and mysticism, he was chosen by Ayatollah Khomeini to “Islamicize” Iran’s universities, only to eventually turn against the theocratic state. He paid a price for his dissidence. Vigilantes and other government-supported elements disrupted his widely attended lectures in Iran, beat him and reportedly nearly assassinated him. In a country where intellectuals are often treated like rock stars, Soroush has been venerated and reviled for his outspoken support of religious pluralism and democracy. Now he has taken one crucial step further. Shuttling from university to university in Europe and the U.S., Soroush is sending shock waves through Iran’s clerical establishment.

Enlarge This Image

Alexandra Boulat/VII

Related

TIMES TOPICS: THE KORAN

The recent controversy began about eight months ago, after Soroush spoke with a Dutch reporter about one of Islam’s most sensitive issues: the divine origin of the Koran. Muslims have long believed that their holy book was transmitted word for word by God through the Prophet Muhammad. In the interview, however, Soroush made explicit his alternative belief that the Koran was a “prophetic experience.” He told me that the prophet “was at the same time the receiver and the producer of the Koran or, if you will, the subject and the object of the revelation.” Soroush said that “when you read the Koran, you have to feel that a human being is speaking to you, i.e. the words, images, rules and regulations and the like all are coming from a human mind.” He added, “This mind, of course, is special in the sense that it is imbued with divinity and inspired by God.”

As Soroush’s words spread thanks to the Internet, Iran’s grand ayatollahs entered the battlefield. In their rebuttal, the clerics pointed to the Koranic verses that state “this is a book we have sent down to you (O Muhammad).” They ask, Don’t these verses imply that God is the revealer and Muhammad the receiver? They also point out that there were times when Muhammad waited impatiently for the revelation to come to him and that in more than 300 cases the prophet is commanded to tell his people to do one thing or another. This demonstrates, the argument goes, that the commands are coming from elsewhere rather than from the heart or the mind of the prophet himself.

Soroush, in turn, responds by saying that the prophet was no parrot. Rather, Soroush told me, he was like a bee who produces honey itself, even though the mechanism for making the honey is placed in him by God. This is “the example the Koran itself sets,” says Soroush, citing the Koran: “And your Lord inspired to the bee: take for yourself among the mountains, houses . . . then eat from all the fruits . . . there emerges from their bellies a drink . . . in which there is healing for people.”

Soroush has been described as a Muslim Luther, but unlike the Protestant reformer, he is no literalist about holy books. His work more closely resembles that of the 19th-century German scholars who tried to understand the Bible in its original context. Case in point: when a verse in the Koran or a saying attributed to Muhammad refers to cutting off a thief’s hand or stoning to death for adultery, it only tells us the working rules and regulations of the prophet’s era. Today’s Muslims are not obliged to follow in these footsteps if they have more humane means at their disposal.

Soroush’s latest views have not endeared him to the powerful conservative wing of Iran’s establishment. Some have accused him of heresy, which is punishable by death. There have been demonstrations by clerics in Qom, the religious capital of Iran, against his recent work. But Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, unexpectedly warned against feeding the controversy. He said those who are employing “philosophy or pseudo-philosophy” to “pervert the nation’s mind” should not be dealt with “by declaring apostasy and anger” but rather countered with the “religious truths” that will falsify their arguments.

In Iran today, many opponents of the government advocate the creation of a secular state. Soroush himself supports the separation of mosque and state, but for the sake of religion. He seeks freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. Thus he speaks for a different — and potentially more effective — agenda. The medieval Islamic mystic Rumi once wrote that “an old love may only be dissolved by a new one.” In a deeply religious society, whose leaders have justified their hold on power as a divine duty, it may take a religious counterargument to push the society toward pluralism and democracy. Soroush challenges those who claim to speak for Islam, and does so on their own terms.

Mohammad Ayatollahi Tabaar is an adjunct lecturer at the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/07/magazine/07wwln-essay-t.html?src=tp&_r=0

Nothing "Muhammad" in the Qur'an. HA...7X

Sunday, 2 June 2013

Tiada "muhammad" dalam Al Quran

By Saim Bakar

Even the proper noun “muhammad” is not in the Quran

Yes it is true. The proper noun ‘muhammad’ is not found written in the Quran. This means the Quran does not recognise ‘muhammad’ as the name of the Prophet of Islam. This is a very big claim but as usual it is easy to prove this point from the Quran.

First here is a simple lesson in arabic. In arabic all proper nouns are prefixed with ‘al’. So in arabic it should be al-muhammad. But there is no ‘al muhammad’ in the Quran. In arabic a proper noun is called an isme ma’rifah. When it is NOT a proper noun, without any prefix “al” then it becomes a simple noun. In arabic a simple noun is known as a nakirah.

But here is the catch : there is no mention of a simple noun ‘muhammad’ in the Quran either. What is found written in the Quran are the adjectives “muhammadoon”, “muhammadeen” and “ahmadoo”. These are all adjectives in the arabic language and are definitely not proper nouns (isme ma’rifah) nor simple nouns (nakirah).

“Muhammadoon” and “muhammaddeen” are adjectives meaning a ‘praiseworthy person’. Similarly ‘ahmadoo’ is an adjective meaning someone ‘who shall be praised’. We will relook all these five verses shortly to see how these adjectives fit perfectly into the context and meaning of these five verses.

How did I stumble upon this? The four verses in the Quran where the scholars misinterpret and mistranslate the adjectives “muhammadoon” and ‘muhammadeen” to become the proper noun ‘muhammad’ are 3:144, 33;40, 48:29 and 47:2. The scholars are being dishonest.

The fifth verse which the scholars misinterpret and mistranslate is 61:6 where the adjective ‘ahmadoo’ is twisted around to become the noun ‘ahmad’. Then they twist the meaning once more by saying that this imaginary noun ‘ahmad’ also refers to ‘muhammad’. So first they magically invent the nouns ‘ahmad’ and ‘muhammad’ from thin air and then say that these created nouns are interchangeable. This is just more dishonesty. The verse 61:6 only mentions the adjective “ahmadoo.”

After undertaking such linguistic gymnastics the scholars say that the Quran has five references to the Prophet’s name. There is no such thing. There are only five different mentions of the adjectives “muhammadoon”, “muhammadeen” and “ahmadoo”.




When I studied the Quran, minus any preconceived notions or prejudices, I realised there was something not right with the traditional understanding of the following verse in the Quran.

33:40 Ma kana muhammadoon abaa’a ahadin min rijaali-kum wa laakin rasoolul laahi wa khaatama al nabiy-yeena wa kaanallaahu bi kulli shay-in aaleeman

Here is the traditional translation by A Yusuf Ali:

33:40 Muhammad is not the father of any of your men (sons), but (he is) the Messenger of Allah, and the Seal of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge of all things.

The first question that popped into my head was why would God NOT make the Prophet the father of any sons? Why deny the Prophet the joy of being the father of sons?

Then the scholars say that the Prophet did have one son – Ibrahim – who died as an infant. Even if this story was true, it simply means that this verse in the Quran has been disproven – it becomes a historically false statement because at a point in time in history, the Prophet did have a son.

If the scholars retort that the verse was revealed after the baby Ibrahim had died, it raises even more doubt. Surely God knew he would be revealing this verse at some point in history. So was God condemning the baby Ibrahim to an early death just so that this verse would stand? Asides from trying to potray God as very cruel, it is also illogical.





Then I realised that there was no proper noun ‘muhammad’ in this verse at all. ‘Muhammadoon’ is an adjective which means ‘praiseworthy’. Only then the true meaning of the verse fell into place:

33:40 It is not praiseworthy to be the father of sons from among you, but it is so to be the Messenger of God, and to be the last of the Prophets: and God has full knowledge of all things.

Obviously this verse addresses a culture which prefers sons over daughters. Not only Arab but Chinese, Indian and other cultures have a distinct preference for sons over daughters. This verse seeks to correct this misconception. It is not praiseworthy to have sons over daughters. The meaning of this verse then fully tallied with other verses in the Quran which chastises the wicked custom of burying female infants alive. Here are the verses:

81:8 And when the female (infant) buried alive shall be questioned.
81: 9 For what sin she was killed?

So it is not praiseworthy to prefer sons over daughters.

Once I realised this simple truth, the three other verses that mention “muhammadoon” and “muhammadeen” fell into place too.

3:144 : Wa maa muhammadoon illa rasoolun qad khaa-lat min qablihi al rasoolu afaa-in maata au qutila in qalabtum ala iqaa bikum waman yan qalib ala aqi bayhi fa lan yadurra Allaaha shay-an wa sayaj-zee Allahu al shakireena.

Here is the traditional translation by A Yusuf Ali:

3:144 Muhammad is no more than a messenger: Many were the messengers that passed away before him. If he died or were slain, will ye then turn back on your heels? If any did turn back on his heels, not the least harm will he do to God; but god (on the other hand) will swiftly reward those who (serve Him) with gratitude.

Here is the more accurate translation:

3:144 There is no (bigger) praiseworthiness than to be a messenger: Many were the messengers that passed away before him. If he died or were slain, will ye then turn back on your heels? If any did turn back on his heels, not the least harm will he do to God; and God will swiftly reward those who (serve Him) with gratitude.

And here is 48:29

48:29 Muhammadun rasoolullaahi wallatheena ma’ahu ashaddoo ala alkuffari ruhmaai baynahum tarahum rukka’an sujjadan yabtaghoona fadlan minallaahi wa ridwaanan seemahum fee wujoohihim min athaari as sujoodi thaalika mathaaluhum fee al tawraati wamathaaluhum fee al-injeeli kazara akhraja shataa-hu faazarahu faistaghlatha faistawa ala sooqihi yu aajibi al zura’a li yagheetha bihim al kuffaara wa’adallaahu allatheena aamanoo wa’amiloos saalihaati minhum maghfiratan wa ajran atheeman

Again here is Yusuf Ali’s translation:
48:29 Muhammad is the messenger of Allah; and those who are with him are strong against Unbelievers, (but) compassionate amongst each other. Thou wilt see them bow and prostrate themselves (in prayer), seeking Grace from Allah and (His) Good Pleasure. On their faces are their marks, (being) the traces of their prostration. This is their similitude in the Taurat; and their similitude in the Gospel is: like a seed which sends forth its blade, then makes it strong; it then becomes thick, and it stands on its own stem, (filling) the sowers with wonder and delight. As a result, it fills the Unbelievers with rage at them. Allah has promised those among them who believe and do righteous deeds forgiveness, and a great Reward

Rephrasing just the beginning of this verse, it sounds like this:

48:29 It is praiseworthy indeed to be the messenger of God...

This tallies exactly with verse 3:144 above. Here is the last one which mentions ‘muhammadeen’

47:2 Wal-lathee na amanoo wa’aamiloos saalihaati wa amanoo bimaa nuzzila ala muhammadeen wahuwa al haqqu min rabbihim kaffara anhum sayyi-aa tihim waslaha balaahum

Yusuf Ali translates it as :

47:2 But those who believe and work deeds of righteousness, and believe in the (Revelation) sent down to Muhammad - for it is the Truth from their Lord,- He will remove from them their ills and improve their condition.

The more acccurate translation is : And those who believe and work righteousness and believe in what was sent down upon praiseworthiness – and it is the truth from their Lord – He will remove from them their ills and improve their condition.

Finally lets look at the adjective “ahmadu” which is mentioned in 61:6 and which meaning has been twisted to become a noun ‘ahmad’.

61:6 Wa-ith qaala eesa ibnu maryama ya banee isra-eela innee rasoolul laahi ilaykum musaddiqan lima bayna yadayya min al tawraati wamubashiran bi rasoolin ya’tee min ba’dee ismuhu ahmadu falamma jaa ahum bil bayyinaati qaloo haatha sihrun mubeenun

Here is A Yusuf Ali’s translation :

61:6 And remember, Jesus, the son of Mary, said: "O Children of Israel! I am the messenger of Allah (sent) to you, confirming the Law (which came) before me, and giving Glad Tidings of a Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmad." But when he came to them with Clear Signs, they said, "this is evident sorcery!

Here first I would like to show you two other translations of this verse by Muhammad Marmaduke Pickthall and Rashad Khalifa.

Muhammad Marmaduke Pickthall : And when Jesus son of Mary said: O Children of Israel! Lo! I am the messenger of Allah unto you, confirming that which was (revealed) before me in the Torah, and bringing good tidings of a messenger who cometh after me, whose name is the Praised One. Yet when he hath come unto them with clear proofs, they say: This is mere magic.

Rashad Khalifa : Recall that Jesus, son of Mary, said, "O Children of Israel, I am GOD's messenger to you, confirming the Torah and bringing good news of a messenger to come after me whose name will be even more praised." Then, when he showed them the clear proofs, they said, "This is profound magic."

Please note that both Pickthall and Khalifa do not use any noun form “ahmad” – because they both acknowledge that it is not a noun. They stick to the adjective ‘ahmadu’.





Then in 2009 Professor Muhammad Sven Kalisch, a native German born Muslim and a professor of Islamic studies at the University of Munster in Germany made a statement that was quite startling to many people. Professor Kalisch said that there was no evidence to support the existence of a historical “Prophet Muhammad”. I did smile when I first read this. Here is an English translation of an extract from Professor Kalisch’s paper.

Up to some time ago I was convinced that Muhammad was a historical figure. Although I always based my thinking on the assumption that the Islamic historical narrative regarding Muhammad was very unreliable, I had no doubts that at least the basic lines of his biography were historically correct.

I have now moved away from this position and will soon publish a book in which I will, among other things, comment on this question and explain my arguments in more detail. This essay is only a short summary of my most important arguments. It also deals with the question of what implications historical-critical research has for the Islamic theory and how I deal with my research results as a theologian.

With regard to the historical existence of Muhammad ... I consider my position simply as a continuation of the most recent research results. It appears so spectacular only because it has been said by a Muslim ... Most Western scientists turn down such an hypotheses out of respect for Islam or because they are afraid of the reactions of their Muslim friends or because they think it is speculative nonsense.

The word "respect" sounds wonderful but it is completely inappropriate here because one really refers to the opposite. Whoever thinks that Muslims can't deal with facts puts Muslims on the same level as small children who can't think and decide for themselves and whose illusions of Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny one doesn't want to destroy.

Whoever really bases his thoughts on the equality of all human beings must expect the same intellectual performance. Really treating Muslims with respect would imply that they are strong enough to deal with their religion on the basis of our modern level of knowledge. "Islamophobes" think we Muslims are barbarians, the "kind-hearted" take us for "noble savages"... The result is the same: Muslims are seen as different from the rest of the world -- they either belong in a "petting zoo" or in cages for wild animals, but by all means they belong in a zoo.

The final argument is even more awful because it can only be described as cowardly. Religious fundamentalists are spreading out (not only Islamic fundamentalist) and freedom of thought must be defended no matter what. There must not be any compromise on this otherwise we set the track for a retreat into the Middle Ages and this can happen much faster than many people think.

My position with regard to the historical existence of Muhammad is that I believe neither his existence nor his non-existence can be proven. I, however, lean towards the non-existence but I don't think it can be proven. It is my impression that, unless there are some sensational archeological discoveries -- an Islamic "Qumran" or "Nag Hammadi" -- the question of Muhammad's existence will probably never be finally clarified.

Some people have said that by denying the name ‘Muhammad’ I am denying the very existence itself of a Prophet of Islam. I beg to differ. There was a Messenger or Rasool sent to us who was also a Prophet or Nabi. He was no doubt an Arab because he delivered to us the Quran which is in Arabic. We therefore cannot deny that God did send a Messenger. But his name was not Muhammad – at least not in the Quran.





Is the identity of the Messenger important? Lets listen to the Quran (4:163-166)

4:163 We have inspired you, as we inspired Noah and the prophets after him. And we inspired Abraham, Ismail, Isaac, Jacob, the Patriarchs, Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, and Solomon. And we gave David the Psalms.

4:164 Messengers we have told you about, and messengers we never told you about. And GOD spoke to Moses directly.

4:165 Messengers to deliver good news, as well as warnings. Thus, the people will have no excuse when they face GOD, after all these messengers have come to them. GOD is Almighty, Most Wise.

4:166 But GOD bears witness concerning what He has revealed to you; He has revealed it with His knowledge. And the angels bear witness as well, but GOD suffices as witness

God lists many Messengers or Rasools who were despatched to mankind. Noah, Abraham, Ismail, Jacob, Jesus were just some of them. But in 4:164 above, God says that there were also other messengers “we have told you about, and messengers we never told you about.”

So the exact history and identities of all the Messengers is not important. What is really important is the content of the message which the Messengers brought. This is made clear in 4:165 and 4:166 above. “Thus, the people will have no excuse when they face GOD, after all these messengers have come to them. GOD is Almighty, Most Wise”.

Whether we know the Messenger’s identity or not, the message has been delivered. We, the people have no more excuse. And all the Messengers from Abraham, Moses right down to the last Messenger have delieverd the same message. Here is the Quran:

87:18 Surely this was also recorded in the earlier books.

87:19 The books of Abraham and Moses.

So the teachings of the Quran are exactly the same as what was revealed to Abraham and Moses. This is simple logic – the same God cannot be teaching different things to different people. The Message is certainly more important than the messenger.

source : http://antishirikmalaysia.blogspot.com/2013/05/mitos-al-buraq-adalah-ajaran-sesat.html

Book : The story of 26 prophets in the Koran

Book Title        : The story of 26 prophets in the Koran.
Author             : Steiner Budiman.
Publisher          : Angel Publisher.
Pages               :
Price                     : US$ 7.00 ( BUY HERE ).

Buy at Google Play and Kobo writing Life with cheaper price is U.S. $ 1.99

BOOK NOW FINISHED YET DONE, FINISHED EXPECTED

During this time the scholars of Islam have always said that there are 25 prophets in Islam. They say so because they calculate that the names of the prophets were written in the Koran. Is this true? It turns out they were wrong. Because they forgot the Prophet Khidr. Whereas Khidr is a prophet, a great prophet as Moses had to learn him ( QS 18:60-82 ).

Through this book we will learn the story of 25 prophets and messengers in Islam and how their relationship with Muhammad, the last prophet in Islam. So in fact there are 26 stories of prophets and apostles in the Koran.

The question now is whether the Islamic scholars do not know this? They actually knew, but pretended not to know. The Islamic scholars did not dare to make corrections, fear of being misguided or heretical. When declared heretical then there are two options for those who dare to make a correction of mistakes of their predecessors. First, admit mistakes and return to pure Islam. Whereas pure Islam clearly proven wrong. Ha ... 7x Secondly, if you do not want to admit a mistake it will be considered infidels.

When you declared kafir, then Muslims should kill you because it is the command of Allah SWT and his messenger.

So Muslims only bold and critical of other religions but do not dare to criticize Islam. Once they dare to criticize Islam, there are only two possibilities. First, they are apostates from Islam. Secondly, they are lying to themselves, lying to their own conscience.

Unfortunately most of the people are Muslims who know the peculiarities of Allah SWT, Muhammad, Jibrail, and Islam does not dare to renounce Islam. They fear the Wrath of Allah SWT. Though Allah SWT can not punish anyone at the time of Muhammad.

Allah and Muhammad managed to scare most Muslims to be submissive and obedient to them both. Ha ... 7x

In fact, since the time of Muhammad until now, proved Allah SWT never existed except in the fantasies of Muslims. The proof is the Koran never prove miracles Allah through Muhammad. Allah SWT also never make itself heard, showing his power to men in the time of Muhammad. Ha ... 7x


See our other books in http://angel-publisher.blogspot.com/2013/11/buy-our-ebooks-here-and-get-1-million.html

========================================

Judul Buku        : Kisah 26 nabi dan rasul dalam Alquran.

Author              : Steiner Budiman.

Publisher          : Angel Publisher.

Pages                : 

Price                 : Rp. 21.000,-

SAAT INI BUKU BELUM SELESAI DIBUAT, DIPERKIRAKAN SELESAI

Selama ini para ulama Islam selalu mengatakan kalau ada 25 nabi di dalam Islam. Mereka mengatakan demikian karena mereka menghitung nama-nama nabi yang ada tertulis di dalam Alquran. Apakah benar demikian ? Ternyata mereka salah. Karena mereka melupakan nabi Khidhr. Padahal nabi Khidhr adalah nabi yang besar karena Musa harus belajar kepadanya ( QS 18:60-82 ).

Lewat buku ini kita akan belajar kisah 25 nabi dan rasul di dalam Islam dan bagaimana hubungan mereka dengan Muhammad, nabi terakhir dalam Islam. Jadi sebenarnya ada 26 kisah nabi dan rasul dalam Alquran.

Pertanyaannya sekarang adalah apakah para ulama Islam tidak tahu akan hal ini ? Mereka sebenarnya tahu, tapi pura-pura tidak tahu. Para ulama islam tidak berani melakukan koreksi, takut dianggap sesat atau bidah. Ketika dinyatakan sesat maka ada 2 pilihan bagi mereka yang berani melakukan koreksi dari kesalahan para pendahulu mereka. Pertama, mengakui kesalahan dan kembali ke Islam yang murni. Padahal Islam yang murni jelas terbukti salah. Ha...7x Kedua, jika tidak mau mengakui kesalahan maka akan dianggap kafir.

Saat anda dinyatakan kafir, maka umat Islam boleh membunuh anda karena itu adalah perintah Allah SWT dan rasulnya.

Jadi umat Islam hanya berani dan kritis terhadap agama-agama lain tetapi tidak berani mengkritisi agama Islam. Sekali mereka berani mengkritisi Islam maka cuma ada 2 kemungkinan. Pertama, mereka murtad dari Islam. Kedua, mereka membohongi diri sendiri, membohongi hati nurani mereka sendiri.

Sayangnya adalah sebagian besar dari umat Islam yang mengetahui keanehan dari Allah SWT, Muhammad, Jibril dan Islam tidak berani murtad dari Islam. Mereka takut terhadap azab dari Allah SWT. Padahal Allah SWT tidak bisa mengazab siapapun di zaman Muhammad.

Allah SWT dan Muhammad berhasil menakut-nakuti sebagian besar umat Islam agar tunduk dan patuh kepada mereka berdua. Ha...7x

Padahal sejak zaman Muhammad sampai dengan saat ini, Allah SWT terbukti tidak pernah ada kecuali dalam khayalan umat Islam. Buktinya adalah Alquran tidak pernah membuktikan mujizat yang dilakukan Allah SWT lewat Muhammad. Allah SWT juga tidak pernah memperdengarkan suaranya, memperlihatkan kuasanya kepada manusia di zaman Muhammad. Ha...7x


See our other books in http://angel-publisher.blogspot.com/2013/11/buy-our-ebooks-here-and-get-1-million.html

Book : The truth about the Koran.

Book Title         : The truth about the Koran. 

Author              : Steiner Budiman.

Publisher          : Angel Publisher.

Pages                :

Price                 : US$ 7.00 ( BUY HERE ).

                           Buy at Google Play and Kobo writing Life with cheaper price is U.S. $ 1.99

BOOK NOW FINISHED YET DONE, FINISHED EXPECTED

This is a true fact. Most Muslims do not know what the contents of the Koran. Most of the Muslims can read the Qur'an in Arabic, unfortunately they do not know what exactly they are reading. If they know what the contents of the Koran then most of them will be confused.  Because the contents of the Koran was different from what they know so far.

All they know is Islam a religion of peace. But why the Qur'an teaches hatred, war, jihad and the killing of infidels (non-Muslims). All they know is the jihad against the passions, but why the Koran requires fighting jihad infidel? All they know is that Allah gives sustenance to the Muslims. But why Allah SWT justifies the robbery?

After investigation, it turned out to Muslims had been deceived by the scholars. Most of the scholars conceal the truth that is written in the Koran. If the scholars teach the Koran as written in the Quran then all Muslims are obliged to wage jihad and become terrorists, until Islam is the only religion in the world.

Just imagine if the scholars do not hide the truth about jihad then Muslims would make violence around the world. Why so? Because Muslims do not fear death. If you die then they will go to heaven and get 72 nymph as a wife.

Muslims will fight against the whole world to enforce the sentence of Allah (Tawheed). Because Islam is not strong enough to fight against the whole world then the scholars conceal the truth about jihad. Last battle before the end of the world is between Islam against the Jews / Israel. When the whole world has been dominated by Islam except Jerusalem.

That Muslims should know, the purpose of jihad that Muslims kill and killed. It need not be wondered at because Allah SWT is the god who thirst for human blood. Because Allah SWT is another name for the devil.

See our other books in http://angel-publisher.blogspot.com/2013/11/buy-our-ebooks-here-and-get-1-million.html


=====================

Judul Buku        : Kebenaran tentang Alquran.

Author              : Steiner Budiman.

Publisher          : Angel Publisher.

Pages                : 

Price                 : Rp. 21.000,-

SAAT INI BUKU BELUM SELESAI DIBUAT, DIPERKIRAKAN SELESAI

Inilah fakta yang benar. Sebagian besar umat Islam tidak tahu apa isi dari Alquran. Sebagian besar umat Islam dapat membaca Alquran dalam bahasa Arab, sayangnya mereka tidak tahu apa sebenarnya yang sedang mereka baca. Seandainya mereka tahu apa isi dari Alquran maka sebagian besar dari mereka akan menjadi bingung. Karena isi dari Alquran ternyata berbeda sekali dengan apa yang  mereka tahu selama ini.

Yang mereka tahu adalah Islam agama damai. Tetapi kenapa Alquran mengajarkan kebencian, perang, jihad dan pembunuhan terhadap kafir ( Non Islam ). Yang mereka tahu adalah jihad melawan hawa nafsu, tetapi kenapa Alquran mewajibkan jihad memerangi kafir ? Yang mereka tahu adalah Allah SWT memberikan rezeki kepada umat Islam. Tetapi kenapa Allah SWT menghalalkan perampokkan ?

Setelah diselidiki, ternyata umat Islam selama ini telah ditipu oleh para ulama. Sebagian besar ulama menyembunyikan kebenaran yang tertulis di dalam Alquran. Jika para ulama mengajarkan Alquran seperti yang tertulis di dalam alquran maka semua umat Islam wajib berjihad dan menjadi teroris, sampai Islam menjadi satu-satunya agama di dunia.

Coba bayangkan kalau para ulama tidak menyembunyikan kebenaran tentang jihad maka umat Islam akan membuat kerusuhan di seluruh dunia. Kenapa begitu ? Karena umat Islam tidak takut mati. Jika mati maka mereka akan masuk sorga dan mendapatkan 72 bidadari sebagai isteri.

Islam akan berperang melawan seluruh dunia untuk menegakkan kalimat Allah ( Tauhid ). Karena Islam belum cukup kuat untuk berperang melawan seluruh dunia maka para ulama menyembunyikan kebenaran tentang jihad. Peperangan terakhir sebelum dunia kiamat adalah antara Islam melawan Yahudi/Israel. Saat itu seluruh dunia telah dikuasai oleh Islam kecuali Yerusalem.

Yang umat Islam harus tahu, tujuan dari jihad agar umat Islam membunuh dan mati terbunuh. Hal ini tidak usah diherankan karena Allah SWT adalah tuhan yang haus akan darah manusia. Karena Allah SWT adalah nama lain dari iblis.

See our other books in http://angel-publisher.blogspot.com/2013/11/buy-our-ebooks-here-and-get-1-million.html