purchase books written by me.

purchase books written by me.
Price : Rp. 21.000,- or US$ 7.00

Rabu, 18 Juni 2014

muhammad and sex.

Sahih Bukhari. Vol 7, Book 62. Wedlock, Marriage (Nikaah). Hadith 017.
Narrated by Jabir bin 'Abdullah:
When I got married, the Prophet said to me: "Son of women how have you been married?" I replied, "I have married an old woman." Prophet said, "Why do not you look for girls that you can virgins fondles them?" Jabir also said: Messenger of Allah said, "Why did you not marry the children so that you can play with him and he's playing with you?"

Foto: -->Support fellow patriot Amanda Shea w/a page like<--

The Perverse Sexual Habits of the Prophet

Print Friendly
An Account by Fr. Zakaria Botros
Part 1
“I am only reading what is in Islam’s own books!”
Father Zakaria Botros recently ran a show dedicated to discussing the question of morality and how it is—or should be—one of the hallmarks of “prophethood.” At the start, he posed the focal question of the show: “Was Muhammad the prophet a moral man—the most upright man, worthy of being emulated by the world?”
He opened the show by relying on an Ibn Taymiyya quote, which evaluated the signs of prophethood. Taymiyya asserted that there are many false-prophets, such as Musailima “the Liar,” a contemporary of Muhammad. Taymiyya concluded that many of these so-called prophets are, in fact, “possessed,” and that the only way to determine the authenticity of any prophet is by examining his biography (sira) and deeds, and see if he be found worthy of the title.
Being that this is the first of several episodes devoted to examining the concepts of morality and prophethood (with the notion that the former reinforces the latter), the theme for this particular episode was “purity” (tahara): “Was Muhammad a ‘pure’ man?”—in this context, a question concerning his sexual mores (or lack thereof).
After the preliminaries, Botros looked at the camera and gave a stern warning: “This episode is for adults only! I am going to discuss many things that make me blush for shame, so please: have the women and children leave the room.”
He then asked Muslims watching to keep in mind the question “Is this the prophet I follow?” as he delineated some of Muhammad’s sexual habits.
First, from the Koran, Botros read verses unequivocally stating that Muhammad is the paragon of all virtue and morality, such as “And most surely you [Muhammad] conform (yourself) to sublime morality [68: 4].” He further quoted the ulema, such as Ibn Kathir, all insisting that Muhammad was the “Noblest of all humanity, and the greatest of prophets.”
Botros and his ex-Muslim cohost—the priest had insisted that it be a man for this particular show, lest he be too ashamed to delineate Muhammad’s sexual habits—discussed Koran 4:3, which “limits” a Muslim’s wives to four, plus “what your right hands possess,” that is, slave-girls.
That was apparently not good enough for Muhammad, asserted Botros; an entire verse had to be “revealed” justifying more women for him (Koran 33:50). In fact, Father Botros has carefully compiled a list of all the women—66 are known—to have had sexual relations with Muhammad.
Botros said that was only normal: according to Sirat Al-Halabi, Muhammad can have a woman no matter what, even against her will; and if Muhammad desired a married woman, her husband would have had to divorce her. According to Ibn Sa’ad, who wrote another authoritative biographical account of Muhammad, “The prophet did not die till all women were permitted him” (see Kitab Al Tabaqat Al Kubra, v.8, 194).
The co-host, rather abruptly, interjected – “What of all those rumors that Muhammad exhibited homosexual tendencies?”
Botros dropped his face in his hands and mumbled, “So you still insist we discuss that?” The co-host was adamant, saying it was for Muslims’ own good to know everything.
Thus Botros, after profusely apologizing to his Muslim viewers, saying how embarrassing this was for him, declared: “Look! We’re merely readers here, bringing up what we have read in Islam’s own books! If Muslims don’t like it, they should go and burn these books.”
The first anecdote discussed by the priest revolved around a hadith that, while some ulema say is “weak,” is, nonetheless according to Botros, present in 44 Islamic books—including some highly respected collections, such as Sunan Bayhaqi and Al Halabi.
According to this hadith, a man named Zahir, who used to declare that “the prophet loves me,” said that one day Muhammad crept unawares behind him and put him in a bear-hug. Zahir, alarmed, yelled, “Get off me!” After turning his head and discovering that it was Muhammad, he stopped struggling and proceeded to “push his back into the prophet’s chest—prayers and blessings upon him.”
Another curious hadith contained in Sunan Bayhaqi and which traces to Sunan Abu Dawud (one of the six canonical hadith collections), has Muhammad lifting up his shirt for a man who proceeded to kiss his entire torso, “from his bellybutton to his armpits.”
Botros looked casually at the camera and said, “Imagine if the sheikh of Al Azhar [nearest Muslim equivalent to the pope] went around lifting his shirt for men to kiss his torso” (he proceeded to make smacking kissing noises, for effect).
Said the co-host: “Surely there’s more?”
Botros: “Indeed there is. No less than 20 Islamic sources—such as the hadiths of Ahmad bin Hanbal—relay that Muhammad used to suck on the tongues of boys and girls”…
Part 2
Last we left the priest and his co-host, the former noted that, “No less than 20 Islamic sources—such as the hadiths of Ahmad bin Hanbal—relay that Muhammad used to suck on the tongues of boys and girls.”
Botros proceeded to read aloud from various sources, such as a hadith relayed by Abu Hurreira (deemed an extremely reliable narrator), where Muhammad sucked on the tongues of his cousin (and future caliph) Ali’s two boys, Hassan and Hussein—they of revered Shia memory.
Next he read a hadith of Muhammad sucking on the tongue of his own daughter, Fatima. Fr Botros also added that the Arabic word for “suck” (muss) cannot, as some apologists insist, mean anything but “suck.” “After all,” added the perspicacious priest, “this is the same word used when discussing Muhammad’s ‘activities’ with his wives, especially his beloved child-bride, Aisha.”
With an extremely disgusted look on his face, Botros turned towards the camera and said: “Dear lady, imagine, for a moment, coming home to find your husband sucking on your daughter’s tongue? What would you do? It’s even worse: it’s your prophet—the most “morally upright” man, a man to be emulated by the world! A man who on record used to go around sucking the tongues of his wives, his daughters, and young boys: Are these the activities of the man described in the Koran as being the pinnacle of moral perfection?”
Cohost: “More!”
“Muhammad would not sleep until he kissed his daughter Fatima and nuzzled his face in her bosom [the priest provided the appropriate sources]. Dear lady! what would you say to your husband sleeping with his face in your daughter’s breast—is that the height of morality?!”
At this point, Fr Botros, looking downcast, began apologizing profusely, saying he could only imagine how all these anecdotes must be troubling for Muslims, to which the co-host reassured him: “It’s not your fault, father, but rather the fault of those Muslims recording these vile incidences. Either way: Muslims must know. More please.”
Botros continued reading more revealing hadiths, including one from the Musnad of Ahmad bin Hanbal, which records Muhammad seeing a 2-3 year old girl in her mother’s arms. Muhammad was so “impressed” by her that he said, “By Allah, if this girl reaches marrying age and I am still alive, I will surely marry her.”
Another hadith goes on to say that Muhammad ended up dying before this particular girl reached marriage age, to which the by now vexed priest, unable to contain himself, exclaimed, “Awwww! Poor prophet! He missed one!”
Botros then told viewers to keep this last hadith in mind, for “context,” as he read another hadith from theSunan of Bin Said, which records Muhammad saying “I hugged so-and-so when she was a child and found that I greatly desired her.”
“What prophet is this you follow?!” cried the outraged Coptic priest. “Where is his morality? This is the man that Muslims follow slavishly? Use your minds!”
It was late in the night, yet Fr Botros was not done cataloging his findings regarding the prophet’s “sexual” habits (these shows are an hour and a half long). So, when he moved on to a hadith depicting Muhammad lying next to a dead woman in her grave, as well as pointing to hadith categories called “intercourse with a dead woman,” I happily turned off the satellite and called it a night—till this moment, as I am (somewhat reluctantly) revisiting my notes to prepare this report.
Part 3
Last we left the Coptic priest, he was reading from hadith reports stating that the prophet of Islam “admired” a 2-3 year old girl (saying that he hoped to live long enough to make her his wife), and “laid” in the grave with a dead woman.
In this episode, he began with the prophet’s “transvestite” tendencies. He read from several hadiths, including Sahih Bukhari—Fr Botros claims that there are no less than 32 different references to this phenomenon in Islam’s books—wherein Muhammad often laid in bed dressed in women’s clothes, specifically his child-bride Aisha’s.
Fr. Botros: “Perhaps Muslims think that he only dressed in Aisha’s clothes? Being that she was his “favorite,” perhaps after being intimate with her, he would merely lay in bed with her clothes?” (Here the priest put his face in his hands lamenting that he had to talk of such shameful things.)
Then he offered an interesting and revealing hadith, from Sahih Bukhari (2/911), which records Muhammad saying, “Revelations [i.e., the Koran] never come to me when I’m dressed in women’s clothing—except when I’m dressed in Aisha’s,” implying that it was something of a habit for the prophet to dress in female clothing.
Fr Botros next moved on to some commentaries in the Tafsir of al-Qurtubi—an authoritative exegesis in Islam. He read one anecdote where Aisha said that, one day, while Muhammad was lying naked in bed, Zaid came knocking; Muhammad, without getting dressed, opened the door and “hugged and kissed him”—in the nude. Elsewhere, Qurtubi concludes that, “the prophet—prayers and blessings upon him—was constantly preoccupied with women.”
Fr Botros to Muslims: “So this is your prophet—the most morally upright man? Instead of being preoccupied with, say, prayer or good deeds, he was preoccupied with women?”
He next read from Faid al-Qabir (3/371), wherein Muhammad is on record saying, “My greatest loves are women and perfume: the hungry is satisfied after eating, but I never have enough of women.” Another hadith: “I can hold back from food and drink—but not from women.” After reading these hadiths, Fr Botros would just look at the screen in silence, shaking his head.
He next read an interesting narrative (contained in Umdat al-Qari and Faid al-Qabir). Reportedly, Allah sent Gabriel with some sort of celestial food (called al-kofid) to Muhammad, commanding the latter to “Eat!”—identical to when Gabriel came to Muhammad saying “Read!” (i.e., iqra, the word for Koran). The report goes on to quote Muhammad saying that the food given to him “gave me the sexual potency of 40 heavenly men.” Fr Botros next read from the Sunan of al-Tirmidhi, where it says that the “heavenly man” has the sexual potency of 100 mortal men.
Wondered the priest: “So, doing the math, 40×100, we can conclude that Muhammad, whenever he ate his heavenly aphrodisiac, had the sexual potency of 4000 men? Really, O umma, is this the claim to fame of your prophet—that he was a raving sex maniac?” Then, less seriously, “Imagine the surprise when Westerners find out that, once again, it was Muhammad who first discovered Viagra!”
Zakaria Botros went on to read from more sources, such as Sunan al-Nisa’i, wherein Muhammad used to in a single night “visit” all his women, without washing in between. Asked the priest: “Why even record such obscene and embarrassing things?”
Perhaps most entertaining, Fr Botros spent some time analyzing an anecdote recorded in Ibn Kathir’s al-Bidaya we al-Nihaya. Here is a translation for this lengthy account:
After conquering the Jews of Khaybar, and plundering their belongings, among other things, a donkey fell into the lot of the prophet, who proceeded to ask the donkey: “What is your name?”
The donkey answered, “Yazid Ibn Shihab. Allah had brought forth from my ancestry 60 donkeys, none of whom were ridden on except by prophets. None of the descendants of my grandfather remain but me, and none of the prophets remain but you and I expected you to ride me. Before you, I belonged to a Jewish man, whom I caused to stumble and fall frequently so he used to kick my stomach and beat my back.”
Here, chuckling, the priest added, “a taqiyya-practicing donkey!” He continued reading, “The prophet – may Allah’s prayers and peace be upon him – said to him, ‘I will call you Ya’foor. O Ya’foor!’ Ya’foor replied, ‘I obey.’ The prophet asked, ‘Do you lust after females?’ The donkey replied, ‘No!’”
Cried the priest: “Even the donkey blushed for shame concerning your prophet’s over-sexed inquiries! Here we have what is supposed to be a miracle—a talking donkey; and of all things to communicate to this animal, your prophet’s most urgent question was whether the donkey lusts after females?”
Next, reading from Sahih Bukhari (5/2012), Fr Botros relayed an account where Muhammad went into the house of a young woman named Umaima bint Nua’m and commanded her to “Give yourself to me!” The woman responded, “Shall a queen give herself to the rabble?” Shaking his fist, Muhammad threatened her, and then sent her off to her parents.
Zakaria Botros: “You see, people, even back then, in those dark ages, there were still people who had principles, who did not give way to threats and coercion. However, the real question here is, why was Muhammad contradicting the commandments of his own Koran—”if a believing woman gives herself to the prophet” (33:50)—trying to coerce this young lady?”
Finally, with a most distasteful look on his face, the priest read from a hadith in al-Siyuti (6/395), where Muhammad asserts that, “In heaven, Mary mother of Jesus, will be one of my wives.”
“Please, O prophet,” quoth the Coptic Orthodox priest, “do not implicate our saints with your filthy practices…”
Part 4
Once again, at the start of the show, Fr Botros read from a famous Ibn Taymiyya excerpt regarding how to differentiate between real and false prophets. Taymiyya asserted that there are many false-prophets, such as Musailima “the Liar,” that many of these so-called prophets were, in fact, “possessed,” and that the only way to determine the authenticity of any prophet is by examining his biography (sira) and deeds, and see if he be found worthy of the title of prophet.
After reading the lengthy quote, Fr Botros concluded with a, “Good for you, Ibn Taymiyya! You at least knew this much.”
The viewers were then given the usual warning: “This show is for adults only! Young ladies and children should leave now.” He then exhorted the viewers to keep in mind as he reads about Muhammad that “this is the prophet you follow. Bear this in mind, O you Muslim!”
Fr Botros then lamented how for 1400 years barriers have been erected around Muhammad so no one—Muslim or infidel—could critique his life: “But the time has come, my friends; the barrier is broken!”
Next he recapped the past three episodes dealing with Muhammad’s sexual habits—including (but not limited to) his sucking the tongues of boys and girls, kissing the breasts of his daughter Fatima, “lusting” after 2-3 year-old girls, laying with a dead woman, homosexual inclinations, receiving revelations while dressed in women’s clothing, copulating with nine women in a row without washing in between (and then bragging about it), greeting people while in the nude, and proclaiming that he will copulate with Mary the mother of Jesus in heaven. (To this latter one, the priest, with a disgusted look on his face, said, “Come on, guy! Get real.”)
He began this episode by saying that no less than 34 books, including the Tafsir of al-Qurtubi and Sahih Muslim, record that Muhammad used to “fondle”—Botros scowled at the screen—”kiss and have sex while fasting, though he forbade others from doing so.”
Said the host: “Interesting. But we know that prophets have special dispensations: Do you have anything more explicit?”
Fr Botros: “Fine. How’s this: the prophet used to visit [copulate with] his women when they were menstruating — so sorry for this disgusting topic! Forgive me, people!”
He then pointed out that the main problem with this is that the Koran (2:222)—”Muhammad’s own words,” as he put it—forbade Muslims from going near menstruating women.
He went on to quote from a number of hadiths affirming that Muhammad freely had sex with menstruating women, including from Sahih Bukhari (v.5, p. 350), which said that if Muhammad desired a menstruating woman, he placed a sheet around her and proceeded with his business, to which the priest cried:
“Come on man! Couldn’t you find another one of your 66 women? It just had to be the one menstruating?”
Then, earnestly looking into the camera: “But seriously, people: are you not ashamed of these things? I know I am—just mentioning them. And this is your ‘prophet’—the ‘exemplary man’?”
He then read a hadith, narrated by Aisha, and contained in the canonical six, wherein the prophet’s young wife recounted how, whenever she was menstruating, if the prophet “wanted her,” he used to “command” her to have sex with him, to which the priest exclaimed—”Commanded! This is rape! Who is this character you are following?”
He read from a number of other hadiths, all demonstrative of Muhammad’s sexual proclivities toward menstruating women—which the Koran forbids—adding, “People, if this is how the ‘prophet of God’ behaves, what can we expect from the average man?”
Asked the host: “Well, could other men behave this way?”
Fr Botros: “Sure, the prophet was always generous to his followers, giving them ways out. According to eight hadith compilations, Ibn Abbas relayed that Muhammad said if a man cannot help himself and copulates with his menstruating wife, all he has to do is pay one dinar in atonement; if he sleeps with her towards the end of her cycle, when she isn’t bleeding as much, he need only pay half a dinar—a discount!” [saying "discount" in English and laughing].
Host: “As you pointed out, since Muhammad had so many women, why did he even feel the need to resort to the ones that were menstruating?”
Fr Botros: “Ahhhh. I see you are wisely connecting the dots. The simple reason, my friend, is that Muhammad used to like smelling”—here he went sniffsniff—”menstruation blood.” He then quoted from al-Siyuti, where Aisha relayed that Muhammad said to her “Come here,” to which she replied, “But I am menstruating, O prophet of God.” So he said “Expose your thighs”; she did so and “he proceeded to lay his cheek and chest on her thighs.”
Fr Botros: “Help me people! How can such perverse behavior come from a prophet—the ‘greatest role model’?”
He then read a Sahih Bukhari hadith (v.6, p.2744) relayed by Aisha where she said that, while menstruating, the prophet used to lay his head on her thighs and recite the Koran.
Fr Botros: “While reciting the Koran!!”
Next he read from Ahkam al-Koran (v.3, p.444) where a woman declared that she used to cup water from a well that had, not just menstruation blood, but dog flesh, and all manner of filth, and give Muhammad to drink.
Fr Botros: “What happened to Koran 2:222?! Yet the ‘seal of the prophets’ can drink such foul water?”
Then, while shaking his head with eyes downcast: “O Muhammad, Muhammad, Muhammad…”
Part 5
Last we left the Coptic priest, he was discussing Muhammad’s predilection for menstruating women—even though the Koran itself (as Fr Botros put it, “his own words”) forbid men from getting near to menstruating women.
Here, the priest was interested in examining Muhammad’s faithlessness towards his wives (though one would have thought the plural renders the notion of faithfulness moot), his sexually exploitative behavior, and his reliance on very obscene language.
First, Fr Botros spent some time discussing the well known story where the prophet betrayed his wife Hafsa with a slave-girl (Unfortunately, one cannot capture the hilarity with which the priest recounted this tale.)
In short, after sending Hafsa to visit her father, the latter, halfway there, realized that it was “her day”—that is, the day when, of all his wives, Muhammad would visit her for “conjugal relations.” She hurried back (Fr Botros added “She knew him well: if she wasn’t there on her day, he would go crazy and grab the first female passing by!”).
In fact, Hafsa caught Muhammad with a slave-girl on the former’s bed. Muhammad quickly evicted the slave-girl and told Hafsa that if she kept this between them, he would henceforth refrain from the slave-girl.
To no avail: Hafsa gabbed and soon all of Muhammad’s wives revolted against his incessant philandering; As Fr Botros put it, “When things got critical, Muhammad decided to drop a ‘new revelation’ on them; so he threw surat al-tahrim (66: 1-11) at them, wherein Allah supposedly chastises Muhammad for trying to please his wives by not sleeping around, threatening the wives to get in line lest the prophet divorce them—indeed, lest they all go to hell.”
Then, looking at the screen, Fr Botros asked, “Imagine, dear lady, if your husband asked you to go on errand and then you return before your time only to find him in bed with another woman? What sort of man would that make him in your eyes? Yet it’s worse—it’s your prophet, whom you all extol as the most perfect human, to be slavishly emulated!”
He then pointed out that “clever little Aisha knew him [Muhammad] well”: whenever such verses were revealed rescuing Muhammad, Aisha would often observe that “Verily, your lord [Allah] is ever quick to fulfill your whims and desires (e.g., al-Siyuti v.6, p.629).
Next the priest relayed an account portraying how the prophet sexually exploited a “retarded” woman. According to 23 sources (e.g., Sahih Muslim vol.4, p.1812) a feeble-minded woman came up to Muhammad saying, “O prophet of Allah! I have something for you.” He clandestinely met her out back and took this “something” from her.
Added Fr Botros: “I fear now that many believers will want to implement this sunna—don’t do it, guys, this is just to illustrate…. Listen you Muslims: don’t hate me for revealing all this to you; don’t lie in wait to kill me. I am merely revealing what your books contain. And, as always, we humbly await the great sheikhs and ulema to address these issues and show us where we went wrong.”
Next, Fr Botros discussed the sort of foul language Muhammad — the “greatest example” — employed: “Sorry, so sorry to reveal to you the sort of despicable language Muhammad used—language I am too ashamed to even mention. In fact, your prophet said one of the most obscene Arabic words—the equivalent of the ‘f-word’ [he counseled his Arabic viewers to google the "f-word" to understand what he was talking about]. ”
Refusing to pronounce or spell this word, which he said appears in 67 books, including Sahih Bukhari, the text containing this word, “inkat-ha” — or, in context, Muhammad asking a man about a woman if he “f***** her” — was portrayed on the screen for all to read.
Then, “Quick! take that filth down! What would you Muslims do if the Sheikh of al Azhar went around using such language? Worse — it’s your prophet, the ‘greatest creation.’”
The host asked if Muhammad used any other foul language, to which the priest responded, “Oh, boy, did he ever; unfortunately this program is way too short to list them all.”
According to Qaid al-Qadir (v.1, p.381), Muhammad told Muslims to retort to uppity infidels by saying things like — again, he didn’t pronounce it, but the text appeared on the screen — “Go bite on your mother’s clitoris!” or, according to Zad al-Mi’ad (v.3, p305), “Go bite on your dad’s penis!”
Then, once again while shaking his head in sheer disappointment, “O prophet of Allah…prophet of Allah….Would that you would’ve heeded your lord Jesus’ counsel: ‘The good man brings good things out of the good stored up in his heart, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in his heart. For out of the overflow of his heart his mouth speaks’ (Luke 6:45).”
Raymond Ibrahim is a Middle East and Islam specialist and author of Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians (2013) and The Al Qaeda Reader (2007). His writings have appeared in a variety of media, including the Los Angeles Times, Washington Times, Jane’s Islamic Affairs Analyst, Middle East Quarterly, World Almanac of Islamism, and Chronicle of Higher Education; he has appeared on MSNBC, Fox News, C-SPAN, PBS, Reuters, Al-Jazeera, NPR, Blaze TV, and CBN. Ibrahim regularly speaks publicly, briefs governmental agencies, provides expert testimony for Islam-related lawsuits, and testifies before Congress. He is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, an Associate Fellow at the Middle East Forum, a Media Fellow at the Hoover Institution, and a CBN News contributor. Ibrahim’s dual-background -- born and raised in the U.S. by Coptic Egyptian parents born and raised in the Middle East -- has provided him with unique advantages, from equal fluency in English and Arabic, to an equal understanding of the Western and Middle Eastern mindsets, positioning him to explain the latter to the former.

Sabtu, 07 Juni 2014

If Muhammad astray ( QS 34:50 ) then all the Muslims must go to hell ( QS 19:71 ). HA...7X

Presentasi Letkol Matthew A. Dooley di Kampus Militer As berjudul  Model Desain Operasi Kontra-Jihad, menyerukan langkah kekerasan dalam perang melawan Islam

Did you know?

If Muhammad astray ( QS 34:50 ) then all the Muslims must go to hell ( QS 19:71 ). HA...7X

QS 34:50. Say: "If I am astray, I only stray to the loss of my own soul: but if I
receive guidance, it is because of the inspiration of my Lord to me: it is He
Who hears all things, and is [ever] near."
The above verse clearly wrong because when Muhammad perverted the billions of Muslims must go to hell together with Muhammad.
QS 19:70. And certainly We know best those who are most worthy of being burned
71. Not one of you but will pass over it: this is, with thy Lord, a Decree which
must be accomplished.

So if you are a Muslim or someone who is interested in Islam it is a good idea to investigate in earnest.

So if you are a Muslim or someone who is interested in Islam it is a good idea to investigate in earnest about Allah SWT, Muhammad and Islam.

Remember this.

To investigate about Allah, Muhammad and Islam, then you should investigate the Qur'an and Hadith and biographies of Muhammad, Sirah nabawiyah.

After investigating then you will be surprised to find another Muhammad.

So far, you have been duped by Islamic scholars. Because Muhammad is indeed a very wicked impostor, savage and vindictive. While you are taught that Muhammad was a good, noble, grand and deserves to be a role model.

The question now is how do we know that Muhammad astray?

The answer is in the Koran.

If you investigate the Qur'an then you will know that the author is an idiot because the Qur'an contradicts itself. Ha ... 7x

QS 4:82. Do they not consider the Qur'an [with care]? Had it been from other Than
Allah, they would surely have found therein Much discrepancy.

The fact shows that there are hundreds of verses contradict one another.

In addition you will be surprised to see the fraud committed by Allah to Muhammad and his army. Ha ... 7x

QS 3:124. Remember thou saidst to the Faithful: "Is it not enough for you that Allah
should help you with three thousand angels [Specially] sent down?
125. "Yea, - if ye remain firm, and act aright, even if the enemy should rush
here on you in hot haste, your Lord would help you with five thousand angels
Making a terrific onslaught.
126. Allah made it but a message of hope for you, and an assurance to your
hearts: [in any case] there is no help except from Allah. The Exalted, the Wise:

QS 8:9. Remember ye implored the assistance of your Lord, and He answered you: "I
will assist you with a thousand of the angels, ranks on ranks."
10. Allah made it but a message of hope, and an assurance to your hearts: [in
any case] there is no help except from Allah: and Allah is Exalted in Power,

QS 8:39. And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there
prevail justice and faith in Allah altogether and everywhere; but if they cease,
verily Allah doth see all that they do.
40. If they refuse, be sure that Allah is your Protector - the best to protect
and the best to help.
41. And know that out of all the booty that ye may acquire [in war], a fifth
share is assigned to Allah,- and to the Messenger, and to near relatives,
orphans, the needy, and the wayfarer,- if ye do believe in Allah and in the
revelation We sent down to Our servant on the Day of Testing,- the Day of the
meeting of the two forces. For Allah hath power over all things.
42. Remember ye were on the hither side of the valley, and they on the farther
side, and the caravan on lower ground than ye. Even if ye had made a mutual
appointment to meet, ye would certainly have failed in the appointment: But
[thus ye met], that Allah might accomplish a matter already enacted; that those
who died might die after a clear Sign [had been given], and those who lived
might live after a Clear Sign [had been given]. And verily Allah is He Who
heareth and knoweth [all things].
43. Remember in thy dream Allah showed them to thee as few: if He had shown them
to thee as many, ye would surely have been discouraged, and ye would surely have
disputed in [your] decision; but Allah saved [you]: for He knoweth well the
[secrets] of [all] hearts.
44. And remember when ye met, He showed them to you as few in your eyes, and He
made you appear as contemptible in their eyes: that Allah might accomplish a
matter already enacted. For to Allah do all questions go back [for decision].
45. O ye who believe! When ye meet a force, be firm, and call Allah in
remembrance much [and often]; that ye may prosper:

If Allah is God Almighty and He does not need to cheat. Correct? HA,,,7X

The question now is if Muhammad, Allah be deceived lover, what can you expect from Allah SWT?. Ha ... 7x

So apostasy from Islam before it's too late. Dead in Islam you would go to hell according to the QS 19:71. Ha ... 7x

The Lord Jesus loves you. 



Tahukah anda ?

Jika Muhammad sesat ( QS 34:50 ) maka semua umat islam harus masuk neraka ( QS 19:71 ). HA...7X

QS 34:50. Katakanlah: "Jika aku sesat maka sesungguhnya aku sesat atas
kemudaratan diriku sendiri; dan jika aku mendapat petunjuk maka itu
adalah disebabkan apa yang diwahyukan Tuhanku kepadaku. Sesungguhnya

Dia Maha Mendengar lagi Maha Dekat".

Ayat di atas jelas salah besar karena saat Muhammad sesat maka miliaran umat Islam harus masuk neraka bersama-sama dengan Muhammad.

QS 19:70. Dan kemudian Kami sungguh lebih mengetahui orang-orang yang
seharusnya dimasukkan ke dalam neraka.
71. Dan tidak ada seorang pun dari padamu, melainkan mendatangi neraka
itu. Hal itu bagi Tuhanmu adalah suatu kemestian yang sudah ditetapkan.

Jadi jika anda adalah umat Islam atau seseorang yang tertarik kepada Islam maka ada baiknya anda menyelidiki dengan sungguh-sungguh tentang Allah SWT, Muhammad dan Islam.

Ingatlah ini.

Untuk menyelidiki tentang Allah SWT, Muhammad dan Islam maka anda harus menyelidiki Alquran dan Hadis dan biografi Muhammad, Sirah nabawiyah.

Setelah menyelidiki maka anda akan kaget ketika menemukan Muhammad yang lain.

Selama ini anda telah ditipu oleh ulama Islam. Sebab Muhammad yang sesungguhnya adalah seorang penipu yang sangat jahat, biadab, dan pendendam. Sedangkan anda diajarkan kalau Muhammad adalah seorang yang baik, mulia, agung dan pantas dijadikan suri teladan.

Pertanyaannya sekarang adalah bagaimana kita tahu kalau Muhammad sesat ?

Jawabannya ada di dalam Alquran.

Jika anda menyelidiki Alquran maka anda akan tahu kalau pengarangnya adalah seorang yang idiot karena Alquran bertentangan dengan dirinya sendiri. Ha...7x

QS 4:82. Maka apakah mereka tidak memperhatikan Al Qur'an? Kalau kiranya Al
Qur'an itu bukan dari sisi Allah, tentulah mereka mendapat pertentangan
yang banyak di dalamnya.

Fakta memperlihatkan ada ratusan ayat yang bertentangan satu dengan lainnya.

Selain itu anda akan kaget melihat penipuan yang dilakukan oleh Allah SWT terhadap Muhammad dan pasukannya. Ha...7x

QS 3:124. (Ingatlah), ketika kamu mengatakan kepada orang mukmin: "Apakah
tidak cukup bagi kamu Allah membantu kamu dengan tiga ribu malaikat
yang diturunkan (dari langit)?"
125. ya (cukup), jika kamu bersabar dan bertakwa dan mereka datang
menyerang kamu dengan seketika itu juga, niscaya Allah menolong kamu
dengan lima ribu Malaikat yang memakai tanda.
126. Dan Allah tidak menjadikan pemberian bala-bantuan itu melainkan
sebagai kabar gembira bagi (kemenangan) mu, dan agar tenteram hatimu
karenanya. Dan kemenanganmu itu hanyalah dari Allah Yang Maha Perkasa

lagi Maha Bijaksana.

QS 8:9. (Ingatlah), ketika kamu memohon pertolongan kepada Tuhanmu, lalu
diperkenankan-Nya bagimu: "Sesungguhnya Aku akan mendatangkan bala
bantuan kepadamu dengan seribu malaikat yang datang berturut-turut".
10. Dan Allah tidak menjadikannya (mengirim bala bantuan itu),
melainkan sebagai kabar gembira dan agar hatimu menjadi tenteram
karenanya. Dan kemenangan itu hanyalah dari sisi Allah. Sesungguhnya
Allah Maha Perkasa lagi Maha Bijaksana.

QS 8:39. Dan perangilah mereka, supaya jangan ada fitnah dan supaya agama
itu semata-mata untuk Allah. Jika mereka berhenti (dari kekafiran),
maka sesungguhnya Allah Maha Melihat apa yang mereka kerjakan.
40. Dan jika mereka berpaling, maka ketahuilah bahwasanya Allah
Pelindungmu. Dia adalah sebaik-baik Pelindung dan sebaik-baik Penolong.
41. Ketahuilah, sesungguhnya apa saja yang dapat kamu peroleh sebagai
rampasan perang, maka sesungguhnya seperlima untuk Allah, Rasul,
kerabat Rasul, anak-anak yatim, orang-orang miskin dan ibnusabil, jika
kamu beriman kepada Allah dan kepada apa yang Kami turunkan kepada
hamba Kami (Muhammad) di hari Furqaan, yaitu di hari bertemunya dua
pasukan. Dan Allah Maha Kuasa atas segala sesuatu.
42. (Yaitu di hari) ketika kamu berada di pinggir lembah yang dekat dan
mereka berada di pinggir lembah yang jauh sedang kafilah itu berada di
bawah kamu. Sekiranya kamu mengadakan persetujuan (untuk menentukan
hari pertempuran), pastilah kamu tidak sependapat dalam menentukan hari
pertempuran itu, akan tetapi (Allah mempertemukan dua pasukan itu) agar
Dia melakukan suatu urusan yang mesti dilaksanakan, yaitu agar orang
yang binasa itu binasanya dengan keterangan yang nyata dan agar orang
yang hidup itu hidupnya dengan keterangan yang nyata (pula).
Sesungguhnya Allah Maha Mendengar lagi Maha Mengetahui,
43. (yaitu) ketika Allah menampakkan mereka kepadamu di dalam mimpimu
(berjumlah) sedikit. Dan sekiranya Allah memperlihatkan mereka kepada
kamu (berjumlah) banyak tentu saja kamu menjadi gentar dan tentu saja
kamu akan berbantah-bantahan dalam urusan itu, akan tetapi Allah telah
menyelamatkan kamu. Sesungguhnya Allah Maha Mengetahui segala isi hati.
44. Dan ketika Allah menampakkan mereka kepada kamu sekalian, ketika
kamu berjumpa dengan mereka berjumlah sedikit pada penglihatan matamu
dan kamu ditampakkan-Nya berjumlah sedikit pada penglihatan mata
mereka, karena Allah hendak melakukan suatu urusan yang mesti
dilaksanakan. Dan hanya kepada Allah-lah dikembalikan segala urusan.
45. Hai orang-orang yang beriman, apabila kamu memerangi pasukan
(musuh), maka berteguh hatilah kamu dan sebutlah (nama) Allah sebanyak-banyaknya
agar kamu beruntung.

Jika Allah SWT adalah Tuhan yang maha kuasa maka Ia tidak perlu menipu. Betul ? HA...7X

Pertanyaannya sekarang adalah jika Muhammad, kekasih Allah SWT saja ditipu, apa yang bisa anda harapkan dari Allah SWT ?. Ha...7x

Jadi murtad dari Islam sebelum terlambat. Mati dalam Islam anda pasti masuk neraka sesuai dengan QS 19:71. Ha...7x

Tuhan Yesus mengasihi anda.


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...